|
Stock
size and fishing mortality were estimated utilizing
a Murphy Virtual Population Analysis (VPA) for two data
sets, one with just the reduction fishery landings,
and one that combined the reduction and bait landings
into a combined catch at age matrix. The reference points
contained in Amendment 1 were then recalculated based
on the combined data.
Combined
Reduction and Bait Fishery Data:
- Based
on a combined catch at age matrix, the VPA-generated
estimate of fishing mortality for 2000 (F 2000 = 0.6)
was below both the revised overfishing threshold (F
= 1.1) and target (F = 0.9).
- The
estimate of spawning stock biomass for 2000 (SSB =
90,100 t) was above both the revised threshold (27,500
t) and target (50,000 t) values.
|
Reference
Point
|
Target
or Threshold
Value
|
Current
Stock
Status
|
Evaluation
|
| Fishing
Mortality Target (F target) |
0.9 |
0.6 |
Stock
Healthy
|
| Fishing
Mortality Threshold (F threshold) |
1.1 |
0.6 |
Stock
Healthy
|
| Spawning
Stock Biomass Target (SSB target) |
50,000
mt |
90,100
MT |
Stock
Healthy
|
| Spawning
Stock Biomass Threshold (SSB threshold) |
27,500
MT |
90,100
MT |
Stock
Healthy
|
| |
|
|
|
Based on the revised biological reference points,
the Atlantic menhaden population is not overfished and
overfishing is not occurring. However, the spawning
stock biomass is declining due to a series of years
with poor recruitment (to age-1). There is no evidence
that recent low levels of recruitment have been caused
by overfishing. The poor recruitment appears to be the
result of poor survivorship of age-0 fish prior to their
entry into the fishery at age-1.
Due
to the decline in reduction fishery landings coupled
with increased and improved reporting of the bait fishery
landings, the relative importance of the bait fishery
landings has increased. Because the bait fishery tends
to harvest older and larger menhaden, the combined catch
at age matrix implies that more older and larger fish
were removed relative to the younger and smaller fish.
By relying solely on the reduction fishery landings,
the previous assessments appear to contain some level
of bias. Since the older fish were under-represented,
the assessments underestimated the abundance of older
fish. Using the combined reduction and bait fishery
data removes any bias inherent in relying on the reduction
fishery data only, and provide a more accurate picture
of the total menhaden population.
Also
review:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
|